patching...
Breaking: Carjacker Caught After Chase, 1 Still Sought, Cops Say »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Was the NYPD Justified in its Surveillance of New Jersey's Muslims?

New Jersey residents and politicians are looking for answers about the surveillance of Muslims that happened in 2007.

 

New Jerseyans have discovered that the New York Police Department spent several months conducting surveillance of mosques and businesses, including eateries, that were owned by Muslims during 2007.

The Associated Press reported that the NYPD conducted surveillance on everything from houses of worship to chicken restaurants in Newark. Civil rights groups and politicians have called for an investigation by the state Attorney General's Office. And police and state officials have said they did not know the request by the police department would reach this far.

Was this surveillance the actions of an overzealous police department? Or simply an anti-terrorism measure designed to keep New Jersey safe from attacks?

What do you think?

  • Was the NYPD's spying on Muslins in New Jersey wrong?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes, it violated people's civil rights and targeted them soley because of their religion.
        77 (17%)
    • No, it was part of an anti-terrorism campaign to keep Americans safe.
        321 (73%)
    • Not sure. I think we need more information about what happened and who knew about it.
        37 (8%)
    Total votes: 435
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Muslims

m

8:49 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

If we a looking to protect innocent victims from religious zealots-who kill in the name of their religion and hatred of the US--Is a religious institution not the most logical place to look?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elizabeth

1:06 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Hey, but no lumping! We aren't allowed to lump. When the same type of snake bites you every time, STILL... no lumping! You aren't allowed to learn to stay away and be suspicious of that particular type of snake. Ridiculas. Goes against our basic instincts and how we have managed to survive thousands of years. They can't be trusted. They use our sympathy and Western ideals of right and wrong against us. They are operating on a whole other level. We have to meet them on that level, and keep an eye on them. Why? BECAUSE THEY DO THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER....

Philip Lutz

10:23 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Why don't you print these poll results and send to other newspapers.How people really feel is more important the the politically correct sentiment that the media expresses. The NYPD should be commended for their efforts to provide safety to the public and we are lucky to have them doing their job!! I sleep better at night!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barbara Curran

12:04 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

I agree with Mr. Lutz and hope you will forward the polls to the offices of the Governor and Mayor.
Confident surveillance is Needed

Comment_arrow

Belleville Sentinel

3:04 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Patch provides a disclaimer that their polls are not scientific and among all the reasons for this necessary disclaimer perhaps none of them is as significant as the fact that it is trivially possible for one individual to vote in a given poll as many times as he/she wishes, something that anyone with the most elementary knowledge of tracking cookies immediately discovers and can circumvent. This posting will likely be deleted by the management as soon as the public discovers just how unscientific these polls truly are.

Comment_arrow

John Lee

4:35 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Well I just discovered the flaw in the poll, it's completely possible to cast the same vote again and again and again, for all we know three people can be voting "No" multiple times each.

Jim

12:33 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Funny how we refuse to buckle to political correctness when we are afraid of terrorism, but we are slaves the the PC machine in every other aspect of our lives. We, the general public, are a complete joke sometimes.

This is called being proactive. If you read further into the case, they were not arbitrarily following around every Muslim they could find. They targeted organizations that had, in previous cases, been breeding grounds for radical ideology, and ones suspected of having ties to particular clerics and organizations.

Reply

John Lee

4:26 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Last time I saw a headline showing Islamic Terorists causing harm in the US was 11 years ago, last time I saw a headline with a devout Roman Catholic doing things with young boys at a school in New Jersey was only a few weeks ago. Then of course there is a teacher from Lyndhurst, the former DEA agent in Nutley, and that filth from Penn State, all Roman Catholic, all involved with children and/or teens. Following every Roman Catholic is not going to stop child sexual abuse any more than following every Muslim is going to stop terrorism. But if the NYPD continues its ways I would have to support monitoring of every RC everywhere.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monk

4:36 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Wow, John Lee! You actually think that Catholicism is a greater danger than militant Islam?

Comment_arrow

Belleville Sentinel

5:26 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

I guess the Crusades and the Inquisition were just harmless affairs in the history of Western Civilization?

Comment_arrow

John Lee

5:40 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

well Tom, given that nothing has happened in 11 years with regard to "militant Islam" in the US, but news of children being molested is a fairly common event, I would have to say "yes."

Comment_arrow

Hedley

7:10 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Maybe the reason nothing has happened is directly related to law enforcement aciviies such as this.

Comment_arrow

Monk

9:27 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

John Lee, your stereotyping, reaching into history and leaps of logic are a marvel.

Comment_arrow

Concerned

9:40 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

The reason there have been no terror attach
Ks is because of the constant surveillance that has been going on by NYPD and others like homeland security. Your other comments on the terrible events at RC and PS are other serious issues but have nothing to do with the question these postings are focused upon. Islam fundamentalists are singly focused on destroying our way of life.

Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

10:40 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

"The reason there have been no terror attach
Ks is because of the constant surveillance that has been going on by NYPD and others like homeland security."

You have absolutely no right to make such a statement. Unless you have some special knowledge about terrorism and intelligence (which I SERIOUSLY doubt) then you shouldn't make such outrageous statements that are unsupportable.

Comment_arrow

jamie

12:39 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I applaud you John Lee! Thank you for speak the truth. Do you really want to play the "suspect game" here? Clearly that's what all those commenting on this are doing. Frankly, I'm almost certain that the majority of you if you were in the position of being racially profiled would be appalled by this. If you want to play the suspect game how about we look at the own people in our own towns who are committing crimes. Look at the majority of the population of prisoners and start monitoring those people who fall into that race. Oh no we cant do that. That's racist! Get over it. There are crazy people everywhere and frankly there are a lot of crazy white people in the US. Did we just all of a sudden forget about the KKK? They are white members of society who commit racially biased crimes. Why are we not monitoring all white people? There's no way to justify monitoring a certain group that "fits the profile of being suspect". Such Bullshit. I want these people who comment on this article go up to one of those who they think are suspect. Racism is alive and well clearly its all but a sleep in West Orange. Thanks to your Tom's Dick;s and Harry's.

Crafty Spiker

4:30 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

It's called the Forth Amendment, people. Read; be it - or lose it.

Reply

Monk

4:32 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

I wonder if I should be concerned for my life. I downloaded a copy of the Koran/Quran, and later deleted it. Is that worse than burning it? That crazy book demonizes and condemns "unbelievers" right out of the gate. I'd like to understand Islam. I really would. I borrowed an audiobook lecture on Islam from the public library, and didn't gain any positive insights. It seems like an incoherent bunch of verses. Holden Magroin's post is more coherent than the "English Translation of the Holy Quran: by Maulana Muhammad Ali" Google that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

A

10:12 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Why are my comments deleted? Holden

Comment_arrow

Michael Lewis

11:30 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Holden - Missed your comments (always look for them) but glad to see that you are still commenting!

Comment_arrow

Concerned

7:26 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Tom, a good book to understand Islam is "infidel". You will not be able to put it down. you will be grateful for the proactive NYPD.

John Lee

4:33 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

The Fourth Amendment reads : "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Reply

Butterfly

4:59 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

overreach; why does the NYPD think it has jurisdiction in NJ?
It should have been a case for the FBI

Reply

Latifah

5:19 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

If you read the report, this was not in response to any terroristic concerns. Mosques, Masjids, restaurants, and other social meeting places were monitored by a local police dept. from another jurisdiction. This same dept. maintains surveillance of students that they believe to be Muslims at Universities outside of NYC, anyone with a Muslim/Islamic/Arabic/African name in the tri-state area, and anyone who has converted to Islam. This is not the FBI and COINTELPRO, but a supposedly "local" police dept. that has become an intelligence gathering organization without
jurisdiction or mandate.
You always sleep well at night as long as you think you are not one of "them", Muslim, Black, Poor, Immigrant, Latino, ________ (fill in the blank). Just remember, that your "Us" status is tenuous at best.

Reply

A. Gideon

6:45 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

"Just remember, that your "Us" status is tenuous at best."

An editorial in today's NYTimes - http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/25/opinion/nocera-a-revolutionary-idea.html - reminded me of an old absurdity I'd noted. When the Puritans arrived here, they didn't seek to establish a place devoid of religious bigotry. There merely wanted to be the bigots in charge.

I'd seen this before in my own life: victims of some form of oppression with no hesitation to oppress. I've never understood this.

The point about our membership in the "us" group being tenuous reflects my logic. Why would I want a society that condones bigotry and discrimination if it can one day be turned on me or my children? Yet this seems to be exactly what some here do seek.

It's not smart,

...Andrew

Reply

Brendan Galligan

1:33 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I agree with Butterfly. While I am torn between national security and individual liberties, I am steadfast in my belief that such investigations should be handled at the federal level or at the very least by cooperating state police agencies, not municipal police. Yes, the NYPD is a municipal agency, albeit the largest in the country.

Reply

GGG

8:49 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I don't see a violation to the 4th amendment. Where in the story does it say that the NYPD has searched private property? Surveillance and monitoring of persons and places is absolutely what all law enforcement should be doing. That is called proactive police work. Thank you NYPD. And to all you narrow minded people who think the police do this based solely on the fact that the targets are muslin, think again, do you really believe that the police have never conducted surveillance on Italians or Russians or social clubs in the past. If the NYPD or any police department wants to set up shop across the street from my home and or place of worship and monitor me that’s fine. I bet after a few days or weeks they will be gone because I am not doing anything wrong. Innocent people need not worry. God Bless America

Reply

firedup49

1:15 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Dam if you do Dam is you don't.... Islamist extremist exist, if they do not check and something happened someone gets blame. If you do check you still get blame. I think I would go with the safe side and check. This is not discriminating.

Reply

Mike

10:12 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

John, You said "Last time I saw a headline showing Islamic Terorists causing harm in the US was 11 years ago". Respectfully, you must not look hard. From Saturday's Investors Business Daily Op Ed page:
"- On Feb. 17, the FBI nabbed a Muslim suicide bomber headed for the U.S. Capitol.
- In September, a Muslim man from Massachusetts was busted plotting to fly bomb-laden model planes into the Capitol and Pentagon.
- Nearly a year earlier, a Muslim man from Virginia was arrested for trying to help al-Qaida plan multiple bombings against the D.C.subway.
- In 2010, another Virginia Muslim — this one an ex-Marine — screamed "Allah Akbar" as he shot at the Pentagon and other military buildings.
- On Feb. 10, an Islamist man with ties to Uzbekistan pleaded guilty to plotting to assassinate the president.
- This past week a Saudi national had to be restrained after smoking an electronic cigarette on board a flight from Portland to Houston. He punched a crew member and screamed "Allah is great, Allah is great" before being subdued. He also made references to Osama bin Laden.
- Last year, in another example, a Yemeni man rammed the cockpit on an Airlines flight while screaming "Allah Akbar."
http://news.investors.com/article/602311/201202241858/republican-debate-glosses-over-terror-threat.htm?src=SeeAlso

Reply

Jimmy

11:55 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

If we are to allow profiling then we might as well start encouraging the IRS to profile white men and perform audits on them every year. White men are the richest members of our society, their cheating on taxes each year costs the US more money than other races/sexes. None of should mind this intrusion as it is for the better good, right?

Reply

Martin Rommer

12:48 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012

Does anyone else find it strange that the same people who "blamed Bush for 'allowing' 9/11 to happen" are the same ones belly aching about the surveillance being conducted? Unfortunately, and right or wrong, the "terrorist" element in the Muslim community hides in plain sight, and uses Mosques usually without the Mosque knowing it is being used.

NYPD can do this because of something called "mutual aid." It's Intelligence Division has contacts in the FBI, and if they did uncover something, the local police would be informed and asked to take the appropriate action. While this may be hurtful or insulting for the Muslim Community, they need to recognize that it is meant to keep them safe as well. Would you prefer to be known as the place that a plot was thwarted, or the place that inspired the plot?

Reply

Latifah

3:30 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012

As has been reported by the AP when this story began to come to light last year, this is a CIA operation, which completely goes against their mandate re: domestic surveillance, funded with Federal Anti-Drug money from the White House, carried out by the NYPD. These ARE the " blame Bush for letting 9/11 happen" folks. In fact, the NYPD/CIA has gone AGAINST the FBI in carrying out this operation and arresting/charging individuals based on it. And with all of this 24/7 monitoring of Muslims, I expect the next real "terrorist" to look, live, socialize, and pray just like the "mainstream"- you know, like Oklahoma.

Reply

jamie

12:55 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

My god white people. For every problem there exists in the world if you look closely, its the white man who is the root of the problem. They are the root of all the problems and are the first to cry injustice and alarm the world of concern of world affairs. Lets not play dumb or naive here. This is how ugly it can get if you want to go there. If you really want to come out your shell and be as open to the world as possible and let it all out then it will get ugly. I cant sit here and pretend that half these comments about being for racial profiling is not from white people. Do you fact checking people. Evil people are all around the world and ultimately they get their resources and funding from one source. Drug dealers, terrorists, mafia, politicians all run in the same circle. That's the truth of the matter no matter how much you tend to look the other way. That's life and these are rules to live by if you're going to survive here. It's just sad that its 2012 and every time you think some sort of real progress is being made to close the gap between people the bigots come out in full force. The same people who are saying to racially profile people who are easily the same ones who are treating their sicked loved ones or even themselves, who are kind of enough to put up with their arrogance and rudeness and chauffeur their sorry behinds.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jenny

10:53 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Oh the self hating dreaded White man... or are you? White people's countries are the most desirable to live in. Yes we have done wrong, WHO HASN'T? Who in this world is innocent? Yet the whitest countries are the most desirable and liveable. But no, we aren't allowed to say that. It isn't Politically Correct. Pft! It is what it is...

Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

11:47 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Jenny, you are quite the pip! Do you actually believe that hooey, or is it just for show on a chat board? Not only is it sad how desperately you want to be the victim, but I can come up with about 100 examples of where your little "theory" (for lack of a better word) falls apart.

Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were a whole big heaping portion of WHITE WHITE WHITE. The French Monarchy didn't have a whole lot of people of color around. The Russian Czars were quite pale. The Romans were defeated by -- German and Gaullic tribes (for the most part).

I am going to have to assume you were making a funny, because otherwise I can't say I understand how your thinking processes work.

Concerned

7:21 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Nick Munson, I
See Mike's post above and his the list of foiled terror attempts. I have every right to make the statement I did in my post. Every day the NYPD has surveillance of bridges and tunnels and major transportation hubs. Divers are deployed regularly checking the footings of bridges and as information is received of potential attacks these activities are increased. The NYPD is the only police force with Arabic speaking detectives undercover in the middle east. It's truly astounding how thorough they are protecting the number one target of these extremists, NYC. The reason we have been safe for 11 years and will continue to be is because of the NYPD. As long as we have leaders who witnessed or remember the innocent good people who jumped to certain death from the burning towers instead of facing certain death by fire, we will have a proactive not reactive NYPD. They remember the towers coming down and the death of so many. NYPD remain proactive and as we did in WWII when we spied on anyone possibly associated with the Nazi's to stop their awful aggression and destruction of innocent people because of their creed, race and infirmities.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Butterfly

11:50 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Concerned, you realize that you fervently argue in favor of a police state?
The reaction to the failings of the security instruments on 9/11 was to increase the quantity of big brother measures and the militarization of the local police forces, while spinning on the fearfulness of the people. What should have happened is an increase in the quality of the existing apparatus back then and holding the top people responsible for their failings.
But that is water under the bridge and we have to live with over-reach, selective profiling against minorities and the mass paranoia you so wonderfully display.

Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

11:26 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

It's "Muson", Concerned. I prefer to remain non-anonymous.

You miss the point entirely. Your statement is by definition illogical. The absence of an action proves nothing.

My two boys were born healthy without any birth defects. Is it because my wife didn't drink during her pregnancy? We cannot say, unless we are unconcerned with logic.

And thanks for the pious reminder of what 9/11 meant.

Paul Corrigan from West Orange

9:19 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

If the information was out in the open, then who cares. The gov. reads all e-mail and monitors all cell/phone traffic as it is and yet we bleat like goats when NYPD looks at facebook pages that are open? Gimme a break. Odds are it will be lone whackos who do the damage rather than our American Muslim friends.

Reply

Jenny

10:51 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Yet we keep letting these religious fanatics into our country thinking they'll meld in like all the other Immagrents. These are not "Westernized" people. These are not Italians or Irish, or even Indian (India) or Hispanics. These people are hard wired to decieve and do in all those who do not believe their crazy religion. Sweden is now paying for that liberal Westernized belief. Oh, they'll adapt and change. WRONG! They want to do us in and take over. And we keep letting them in. How stupid can we be? Just plain STUPID!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jimmy

10:46 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Exactly! We need to have a litmus test to become an American. You must be Christian and agree with the Bible and Constitution. You also have to speak English because if you don't know how to how could you read the Bible or Constitution. You should also have to make a certain amount of money each year so that you do not become a drain on our wealthiest taxpayers. Did I miss anything? They should probably swear allegiance to the Christian God when they come in off of their boats just in case they are trying to fool us. We could make that a part of the TSA's job or customs.

Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

11:36 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Jenny, you should read-up on what sort of people have been categorized as "religious fanatics" by anti-immigration forces over the last 200 years ago -- especially those Irish and Italian Papists.

You should realize that your screed could've been published almost verbatim by anyone frightened of the "new": in 1850 it would've been the Irish and Chinese, in 1880 the Italians, in 1900 the Jews and Eastern Europeans, and you can keep going right up until now with yours.

Concerned

11:44 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Nick, you are not considering that terrorist attacks were in fact detected and stopped, Mike's list is a partial list but it makes the point that the surveillance has stopped terrorist attacks so far. The drone attacks on the leaders of the Islamic terrorist has also helped stop further attacks. How to use the word "pious" to describe anyone who honors and make sure that the 9/11 horrific attacks are not forgotten is a very sadd misuse of rhetoric!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nick Muson

11:53 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Concerned, I know those things -- I am big with the whole "reading and being aware of current events" thing.

You still don't get it. YES, the NYPD has stopped several attacks. Does it make you feel better if I say that? But that does not mean that we haven't had attacks because of the NYPD, unless you are UN-Concerned (get it? a little levity there) with having a cohesive logical argument.

I am sure you don't think you were being pious and aloof, but I am sick of people evoking 9/11 as if they have their fingers on the pulse of America.

Concerned

12:07 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Butterfly, no one wants a police state, but we must have security. Is Israel a police state or do they have strong monitoring controls to ensure the safety of their citizens from terror attacks? Was London in WWII a police state as they made sure the Nazi's did not infiltrate their government and undermine their sovereignty? My fated grew up in Queens NY and recall the time Germany was advancing throughout Europe and there were German groups, NOT ALL Germans, that were meeting in support of the Nazi movement. The government properly saw those groups as risk to our country and monitored them. Bobby Kennedy as Attorney General monitored the horrific KKK as they committed atrocities against innocent Black people. Was that a police state to monitor invididipuals who were white and perhaps members of the KKK? I am sure some white people were monitored who were not in the KKK. Was that wrong? Of course not as there was a greater good at stake. Our constitution allows for flexibility to ensure that in times of danger that our government can protect our liberties. The radical Islam want to destroy or freedoms and constitution and replace it all with the Koran. Radical Islam is no different that what the Nazi's wanted to accomplish, totalitarian dictatorship of all and destruction of anything that stands in the way of their version of Islam or as the Nazi's professed Arian Supremacy.

Reply

Concerned

12:14 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Nick,
You need to read the full post that I made. I said that the NYPD and the military drone attacks have twarted further terror attacks, and now I will add, the CIA and military and other intelligence gathering agencies are gathering information every day that is trying to keep us all safe. I recall 9/11 not as a way to claim the pulse of America, but rather to keep recent history in focus.

Reply

Mike

1:56 pm on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

This situation reminds me of an analogy I read once. I paraphrase LTC (RET) Dave Grossman: 'There are three kinds of people in the world: sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. Sheep are peaceful and helpless. Wolves are violent and prey on sheep. But a sheepdog lives in both worlds…peaceful as a sheep by choice, but capable of being like a wolf when necessary to protect the sheep. A paradox is that while the sheep need the sheepdog, they generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf. He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that the sheepdog must not, can not and will not ever harm the sheep. Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn't tell them where to go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports in camouflage fatigues holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, "Baa."'

There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men. - Edmund Burke

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jimmy

9:29 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

"Analogies prove nothing, that is true but they can make one feel more at home." - Sigmund Freud

Mike

10:39 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

Jimmy, well said and good point. You and Sigmund are correct that analogies prove nothing; that is why they are called analogies. They aren't meant to prove anything definitively, they can only offer things to think about; the final determination still must be made by the individual. In the case of the analogy I used above, nothing was proven, or offered as such. The sheep stayed sheep, the wolves stayed wolves and the sheepdogs continued their thankless but necessary duty; no one's mind or behavior was changed in the pasture. Sounds a lot like this thread. That was the point I was trying to make.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jimmy

10:49 am on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I understand your point, it was well taken then I realized analogies such as yours is great to justify actions that don't fall under the letter of the law. Once again we must sadly reference the Constitution and state laws as to what we are and are not allowed to do whether you're a sheep, wolf, or sheepdog.

Marshall Krugman

2:58 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

For the most part "they" are American citizens who, along with their families, may have been in our Country for many years and have been loyal and patriotic and may have even served our Country in the armed forces. What is happening to "them" would be akin to my parents and myself being under surveillance because my grandparents and parents were born in Eastern Europe. I had apparently been so thorougly veted when I applied for Navy Officer's Candidate School that within days of the Cuban Missle crisis I was quickly given top secret clearance. In my case this inquiry was totally appropriate. It would not have been had I simply been a recent college graduate and a good citizen..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned

3:57 pm on Thursday, March 1, 2012

I feel it's more akin to the surveillance that was done to white christian, principally Baptist, churches to uncover KKK members who were planning and commiting atrocities against innocent black citizens. During the civil rights movement the government certainly violated innocent white Christians rights and privacy as not all white Christians were racists. That said there was no doubt that the government was correct in profiling the white Christian churches for members of the KKK. There was a greater good. The Muslims are not the first to be profiled nor the last. It has to be done when elements of a group, religion or creed decided that violence and terror is okay to destroy our pluralistic society and our freedoms.

Marshall Krugman

1:39 pm on Thursday, May 17, 2012

Remember what happened to American citizens of Japanese descent during WWII? Still a major embarassment for our Country.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monk

8:28 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Not to excuse egregious programs past or present, but what should be done to ensure our safety when murderous fanatics use our own American civility and laws against us?

Leave a comment